http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:831625-1
http://www.catalogueoflife.org/col/details/species/id/b6504aabae5c9d25116ef47fff3bcdb8
http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200014518
Quote: " The name Edgeworthia chrysantha was published a few weeks earlier in 1846 than E. papyrifera and therefore has priority. The oldest name, Magnolia tomentosa , was never generally taken up and was formally rejected to protect E. papyrifera. This means that Nakai’s E. tomentosa is also rejected. "Daphne papyrifera" is not a validly pub lished name: D. Don (Prodr. Fl. Nepal.: 68. 1825) merely cited "D. papyrifera Buchanan-Hamilton" as a synonym of D. odora; later, Siebold (Verh. Batav. Genootsch. Kunsten 12: 22. 1830) commented on the value of "D. papyrifera" for paper-making, referring to E. chrysantha as currently understood, but this is not acceptable as a validating description or diagnosis (see Art. 32.3 of the Vienna Code)."
The former taxonchange was based on theplantlist.org, but this page seems to be outdated. The record derives from WCSP (in review) (data supplied on 2012-03-26)
|
Reemplazado con |
|