Taxonomic Merge 69361
(Guardado el 22/02/2020)
|
|
combinado en |
|
Comentarios
Okay. In that case, the genus should not be used on iNaturalist. It was taken up in PPG 1, but not accepted by POWO. Not taking up this genus would, I imagine, mean not accepting most if not all of the segregates of Blechnum s. l., Which there is a logged deviation for: https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/700994/taxonomy_details. I understand that there is debate regarding whether or not that portion of PPG 1 was truly "community-derived," but it is a contradiction to accept a genus on the site, but have its type species in another genus.
Agregar un comentario
Acceder
o Crear una cuenta
para agregar comentarios.
Neither New Zealand nor Australia, where this species is native, have adopted the move to Cranfilia.