See Johnson & Gosliner 2012 Traditional Taxonomic Groupings Mask Evolutionary History: A Molecular Phylogeny and New Classification of the Chromodorid Nudibranchs
desconocido
Sí
Añadido por drmattnimbs el marzo 19, 2021 06:41 MAÑANA
|
Comprometido por drmattnimbs el 18 de marzo de 2021
I disagree. let me quote:
"They are two of the five chromodorid species with
a plesiomorphic serial reproductive system (C. loringi, C.thompsoni,
C. woddwardae) [26,28,89]. All five of these species are found only in
southeastern Australia. These species were found to be more
closely related to Cadlina than Chromodoris by Wilson & Lee [17],
but as part of the chromodorid grade in Turner & Wilson [27].
Clearly further work on this group and its relationship to all
cryptobranchs is needed. The addition of specimens of C. loringi, C.
thompsoni and C. woodwardae [26,89,99], the only other
chromodorid species known to have a serial reproductive system
may help solve this problem. These two species are always each
other’s closest relatives and are sister to the rest of the Miamirainae
in the all analyses. As suggested by Dayrat & Gosliner they
should be considered Chromodorididae,..."
Chromodorididae thompsoni, is invalid that is the reason why WoRMS lists it still as
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=533917 I thought iNaturalist does follow WoRMS
where do Johnson & Gosliner (21012) write Goniobranchus thomsoni? I have scanned the text
several times, there is NO
Publicado por
erwinkoehler
hace alrededor de 3 años
Los desacuerdos no intencionados ocurren cuando un grupo padre (B) se adelgaza al cambiar un grupo hijo (E) a otra parte del árbol taxonómico, provocando que las Identificaciones existentes del grupo padre sean interpretados como desacuerdos con las Identificaciones existentes del grupo hijo cambiado.
Identification
La ID 2 del taxón E será un desacuerdo no intencionado con la ID 1 del taxón B después del intercambio de ancestros
Si el adelgazamiento del grupo padre provoca más de 10 desacuerdos no intencionados, deberías dividir el grupo padre después de intercambiar el grupo hijo para substituir las identificaciones existentes del grupo padre (B) con identificaciones con las que no esté en desacuerdo,
I disagree. let me quote:
"They are two of the five chromodorid species with
a plesiomorphic serial reproductive system (C. loringi, C.thompsoni,
C. woddwardae) [26,28,89]. All five of these species are found only in
southeastern Australia. These species were found to be more
closely related to Cadlina than Chromodoris by Wilson & Lee [17],
but as part of the chromodorid grade in Turner & Wilson [27].
Clearly further work on this group and its relationship to all
cryptobranchs is needed. The addition of specimens of C. loringi, C.
thompsoni and C. woodwardae [26,89,99], the only other
chromodorid species known to have a serial reproductive system
may help solve this problem. These two species are always each
other’s closest relatives and are sister to the rest of the Miamirainae
in the all analyses. As suggested by Dayrat & Gosliner they
should be considered Chromodorididae,..."
Chromodorididae thompsoni, is invalid that is the reason why WoRMS lists it still as
http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=533917
I thought iNaturalist does follow WoRMS
where do Johnson & Gosliner (21012) write Goniobranchus thomsoni? I have scanned the text
several times, there is NO