Taxonomic Swap 111788
(Guardado el 03/06/2023)
|
|
Reemplazado con |
|
Comentarios
@duarte I agree this is a big change, potentially. Please comment on the flag, where the discussion is ongoing. It may well be that a split should also take place.
Swap has been modified.
see flag here : https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/580319
Swap was finally completed.
Agregar un comentario
Acceder
o Crear una cuenta
para agregar comentarios.
@kitty12 It could make more sense to swap Cistus psilosepalus into Cistus inflatus. Cistus inflatus is treated as C. psilosepalus in Flora Iberica and as a result most people in Portugal and Spain use it for that species. I strongly suspect all observations on iNat refer to the species rather than the hybrid (I know mine do, this name change came as quite the surprise to me).