Taxon swap aaaaaa 48px Taxonomic Swap 76566 (Guardado el 28/05/2020)

Cyperus obtusiflorus (var. obtusiflorus) = C. niveus var. leucocephalus according to POWO and also according to APD that are two independent sources :
http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:305355-1
http://www.ville-ge.ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/africa/details.php?langue=an&id=37631

desconocido
Añadido por abounabat el 28 de mayo de 2020 | Comprometido por abounabat el 28 de mayo de 2020
Reemplazado con

Comentarios

Thumb

Please remember to cross-reference with BODATSA for any southern African flora and get the two databases (POWO and BODATSA) in sync before making any changes to the southern African flora.

Publicado por tonyrebelo hace alrededor de 2 meses (Marca)
Thumb

is BODATSA connected directly or indirectly with APD ?

Publicado por abounabat hace alrededor de 2 meses (Marca)
Thumb
Publicado por tonyrebelo hace alrededor de 2 meses (Marca)
Thumb

http://www.ville-ge.ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/africa/index.php?langue=an
Initially based for southern Africa on "G. GERMISHUIZEN & N.L. MEYER, eds, (2003). Plants of Southern Africa: an annotated checklist. Pretoria"

Publicado por abounabat hace alrededor de 2 meses (Marca)
Thumb

Yes but Germishuizen is 2003: 17 years ago. BODATSA is current - like POWO. So far the talley is 50:50 as to whether BODATSA or POWO is most up to date: as a rough rule BODATSA being when latest literature is more local journals, and POWO when published in the locally unavailable (expensive) international journals.

Publicado por tonyrebelo hace alrededor de 2 meses (Marca)
Thumb

OK, then contrarily to POWO and APD, BODATSA considers both C. niveus and C. sphaerocephalus as varieties under C. obtusiflorus. But as iNat follows POWO, and because this situation generates no ambiguity (even variety as this specific correspondance, and inversely), we can maintain the current situation.
Errol.

Publicado por abounabat hace alrededor de 2 meses (Marca)
Thumb

Whoa: dont let us explore this too detailed at this stage. the curators of POWO and BODATSA will investigate this when they again have access to their resources. Specifically the curator of BODATSA has pointed out that the genus has not been revised on the system for over 5 years, so it may well just need to catch up.
But yes: a link to the latest literature would help.

Publicado por tonyrebelo hace alrededor de 1 mes (Marca)

Agregar un comentario

Acceder o Crear una cuenta para agregar comentarios.