Atención: Algunas o todas las identificaciones afectadas por esta división puede haber sido reemplazada por identificaciones de Megacollybia. Esto ocurre cuando no podemos asignar automáticamente una identificación a uno de los taxa de salida. Revisar identificaciones de Megacollybia platyphylla 63284

Comentarios

@aldendirks and @cooperj, does this split look good to you? I tried to atlas the species as best I could.

Publicado por jameskm hace alrededor de 4 años

@jameskm cool, I didn't know atlasing was a thing. What's up with the blue dots (Megacollybia platyphylla) in North America? I suppose the taxa on the right and number of observations should reflect what will happen after the splitting, and the map reflects this as well. They just don't seem to line up, which is confusing to me.

Publicado por aldendirks hace alrededor de 4 años

The numbers and dots are everything as it is now. Once committed, everything identified as Megacollybia platyphylla will be switched to another name based on the atlases. Everything in Europe will be M. platyphylla for instance, but in Texas, where both texensis and rodmanii are found, observations should get kicked up to Megacollybia. Mostly I am looking to make sure the atlases look okay. I think I have most observations accounted for, except the southern/southeast Asian ones.

Publicado por jameskm hace alrededor de 4 años

Am I correct in thinking all those European M. platyphylla as input would become ambiguous in the output? i.e., the output layer for platyphylla contains no dots.
Is that because of the overlap of marginata/platyphylla sensu stricto? But then in Asia the sequence data indicate there is clitocyboidea and marginata so unique mapping of marginata is equally ambiguous - unless these things look very different. I haven't investigated.

Publicado por cooperj hace alrededor de 4 años

our last responses overlapped - but I don't platyphylla in the output.

Publicado por cooperj hace alrededor de 4 años

Europe and central Asia are only in the atlas for the output, new M. platyphylla (1097548, not 63284), so these SHOULD all just get swapped to the new M. platyphylla. I made sure to atlas all the output taxa this time, so we shouldn't get the fiasco from last time.

Publicado por jameskm hace alrededor de 4 años

again according to sequences marginata is found in europe, south korea, russia and japan. Most sequences from Europe

Publicado por cooperj hace alrededor de 4 años

Ah, right. That sequence. I wasn't quite sure what to do with it. In the Korean paper it was interpreted as being part of M. marginata, and in the original paper it was interpreted as a basal member of M. platyphylla. I also notice that the "M. marginata" clade in the Korean paper is unsupported.

Publicado por jameskm hace alrededor de 4 años

Or, am I missing some other piece of information?

Publicado por jameskm hace alrededor de 4 años

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2019.03.004 Ah, I see this paper has it from the Czech Republic.

Publicado por jameskm hace alrededor de 4 años

I doubt whether many 'atlases' would be definitive for fungi - perhaps easiest to with a first approximation, which is what you had.
As long as platyphyllla doesn't end up bank then I'm happy.

Publicado por cooperj hace alrededor de 4 años

It looks like it worked out fine. I sorted through some of the outputs that got bumped up to Megacollybia. Not too many, all told.

Publicado por jameskm hace alrededor de 4 años

Agregar un comentario

Acceder o Crear una cuenta para agregar comentarios.