FWIW, while I appreciate the discussion in the flag comments, and the fact that you performed such thorough consultation before committing this, I'd also appreciate a brief description here in the taxon change record about why this is happening, and some sourcing, e.g. here the source should probably be Amphibian Species of the World, but mentioning https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18625326 might be worth it too. Not everyone is willing to delve into an extensive discussion thread, and the only content that gets shared on dashboards and in emails is the taxon change description.
Los desacuerdos no intencionados ocurren cuando un grupo padre (B) se adelgaza al cambiar un grupo hijo (E) a otra parte del árbol taxonómico, provocando que las Identificaciones existentes del grupo padre sean interpretados como desacuerdos con las Identificaciones existentes del grupo hijo cambiado.
Identification
La ID 2 del taxón E será un desacuerdo no intencionado con la ID 1 del taxón B después del intercambio de ancestros
Si el adelgazamiento del grupo padre provoca más de 10 desacuerdos no intencionados, deberías dividir el grupo padre después de intercambiar el grupo hijo para substituir las identificaciones existentes del grupo padre (B) con identificaciones con las que no esté en desacuerdo,
FWIW, while I appreciate the discussion in the flag comments, and the fact that you performed such thorough consultation before committing this, I'd also appreciate a brief description here in the taxon change record about why this is happening, and some sourcing, e.g. here the source should probably be Amphibian Species of the World, but mentioning https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18625326 might be worth it too. Not everyone is willing to delve into an extensive discussion thread, and the only content that gets shared on dashboards and in emails is the taxon change description.