Pessoa-Silva M, Hara MR, Pinto-da-Rocha R (2021) Revision of the southern Andean genus Sadocus Sørensen, 1886 (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae, Pachylinae). ZooKeys 1025: 91-137. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1025.57806 (Vínculo)
Please follow the authorities we list in the Curator's Guide. EOL is not one of them, and it's hard to consider them an authority at all since they support multiple taxonomies and generally don't have opinions on what's current or not. GoBotany / Flora Nova Angliae consider B. dissectum to be current (https://gobotany.newenglandwild.org/species/botrychium/dissectum/), as does The Plant List (http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/tro-26602173), so I would revert this change... which is something I need to do, I think, if we want to do it cleanly. Anyway, please don't commit any more taxon changes using authorities we haven't listed. If you want to add more authorities, let's talk about it in the Google Group.
Oops, I missed you saying that you needed to do it. Sorry if I screwed it up (again). Good grief. I'm going to stop messing with taxonomy, unless it's VERY clear that something is wrong (e.g., all those palms that were in a fish genus).
Actually I think what you did is just fine. It just creates a circular loop of swaps, which might actually be better than what I was going to do, since it preserves the history.
Los desacuerdos no intencionados ocurren cuando un grupo padre (B) se adelgaza al cambiar un grupo hijo (E) a otra parte del árbol taxonómico, provocando que las Identificaciones existentes del grupo padre sean interpretados como desacuerdos con las Identificaciones existentes del grupo hijo cambiado.
Identification
La ID 2 del taxón E será un desacuerdo no intencionado con la ID 1 del taxón B después del intercambio de ancestros
Si el adelgazamiento del grupo padre provoca más de 10 desacuerdos no intencionados, deberías dividir el grupo padre después de intercambiar el grupo hijo para substituir las identificaciones existentes del grupo padre (B) con identificaciones con las que no esté en desacuerdo,
Please follow the authorities we list in the Curator's Guide. EOL is not one of them, and it's hard to consider them an authority at all since they support multiple taxonomies and generally don't have opinions on what's current or not. GoBotany / Flora Nova Angliae consider B. dissectum to be current (https://gobotany.newenglandwild.org/species/botrychium/dissectum/), as does The Plant List (http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/tro-26602173), so I would revert this change... which is something I need to do, I think, if we want to do it cleanly. Anyway, please don't commit any more taxon changes using authorities we haven't listed. If you want to add more authorities, let's talk about it in the Google Group.